The Common Core State Standards are arriving like
a train on a long journey. And it is a
journey we will not be joining.
What is the Common Core State Standards? It is an initiative pushed by two groups made
up of leaders from the states, the Council of Chief State School Officers and
the National Governors Association. The
two groups brought together education experts to set standards to ensure
American students would be well prepared for college and careers. Those standards in mathematics and the language
arts are to be implemented beginning the 2014-2015 school year for schools
across the nation. While well
intentioned, they are unfortunately misguided and poorly constructed and will
have a negative impact on education. We
will discuss this a little more in a bit.
The good news is that as it stands now, Common
Core State Standards, or the common core, will have very little effect, if any,
on our school. There will be no adoption
of these new national standards for kindergarten through twelfth grades here on
our humble little campus. From
everything I can get my hands on about it, accepting the common core would be a
major step backwards in the education of our students.
The common core is designed to make students ready
to tackle college and their future vocations and fix the problems of the
current education system, but Bios is clearly in a different boat than most of
the nation’s schools, both public and private, as far as preparing our students
for the future.
First, a review of the present successes of our
school. Our school SAT and ACT scores
are already well above state and national averages. You can find those comparisons on our website. Also on our website is a list of the writing
contests in which the students have been recognized. Just recently, the director of one of the
contests called Bios the “Alabama of essay writing.” For those of you who do not follow college
football where Alabama is a dominant powerhouse, this is quite a
compliment. In academics, we strive
towards all of our students excelling.
In addition, one hundred percent of our students
graduate from high school. Of our
graduates, all but two have gone on to college the year following their
graduation. And of those two, one is
planning to begin college next semester.
Of those going to college, 84% went to college with over 80% of their
tuition paid for through scholarships and grants. And of our current graduating class of
thirteen, twelve out of thirteen have already been accepted to the college of
their choice. As of now, eight of those
twelve going off to college have at least eighty percent of their tuition
covered through scholarships. There are
few schools in the country which can present such numbers.
But we offer more than just academics. Parents arrive at our doorstep not only
because they want their children to learn, but also for the character values we
teach and reinforce based on the wisdom of God through his Word and his
Spirit. And though the skills we teach
are very important in the subjects of math, English, science, history, and the
arts, it is worth little towards their future without the wisdom that only comes
from God. All the math, science, and
other knowledge is fairly worthless without this training of character.
And so we return to the common core – the newest government
solution to the issue of schools nationwide that are failing to prepare
students for the future. This idea of
failing schools, is supported by an article in the Wall Street Journal on
February 21 which stated that an estimated 40 million American adults have not
even earned a high school diploma. In
response to this failing system, there are many, many public and private
schools who are adapting these common core standards. According to the Common Core website,
forty-five states, the District of Columbia, and four territories will be using
Common Core to guide their government schools.
More than 100 Roman Catholic dioceses will be using these same
standards. Many Lutheran schools are
adopting the standards also. But not everyone
is sure of the changes.
As reported in Education Week, there is growing
criticism. The concerns focus on the
increased control of the federal government in national goals and curriculum,
the radical change in the focus of the language arts, as well as broad,
unspecific goals for math. I would share
in those concerns.
In an article written for Education Week back in
February 2012, Joanne Yatvin, former president of the National Council of
Teachers of English, was critical of the lack of recognition that background
and experiences play in reading from the new standards, as well as the new
emphasis on informational text, which ignores the limited experiences of young
students. She completed her concerns
with this comment:
“While
I want to believe the authors of the standards and the publishers’ criteria did
not intend to be as constrictive and authoritarian as their words indicate, I
am aghast at the vision of the dreariness and harshness of the classrooms they
aim to create. Taken together, the standards
and the criteria project an aura of arrogance and ignorance in their
assumptions about how and why children learn, what is actually needed to
succeed in college or the workforce, and the extent of teachers’ knowledge and
expertise.”
Criticism is national. In a recent opinion piece in the New York
Times, noted American mathematician Sol Garfunkel and emeritus professor of mathematics
at Brown University David Mumford wrote:
“This highly abstracted curriculum is simply not the best way to prepare
the vast majority of high school students for life.”
Two recent studies released by the Brookings
Institute stated that the connection between standards and student achievement
is not there, based on scores from the NAEP.
Scores were examined from 2003-2009 with no correlation between scores
and state standards. Standards only
support, but do not create good educational institutions.
Adopting these standards would be a giant step
backwards for Bios. This is evident in
something as basic as choosing curriculum.
Essentially, if a goal or outcome is not working as we planned, we come
together over time discussing what needs to change, we then change it. For example, right now we are not satisfied
with the results we are seeing in the grammar program for our juniors and
seniors. Not horrible results, just not
up to the standard with which we want to send our students off to college. So we, the English teacher and I, search
until we find a text or program we think will support us in the grammar goals
we have set for the soon to be graduates.
No waiting for a district committee, or a school board, or the federal
government to perform a study. And
conversely, if something is working for our school, no need to change it. We can use it for thirty years or more if the
curriculum meets our needs.
In this short essay I cannot begin to give a
decent and thorough accounting of where the common core standards fall short
for us in reading and math, but I will pick on two points. In reading, the goals do not support us where
we have been very successful: Our
students are able to read and comprehend materials in a variety of contexts including
both literary and informational. One
particular passage from the standards reads, “In reading primary sources,
students must learn to set aside their own prior knowledge to focus on the text
itself.” Our school is successful in
part because of the learning built on previous experiences in life. That is true all the way through
graduation. And this is made possible by
having a large variety of materials available for our students to read because
sometimes the tools that are usually successful for some students do not meet
the needs of all.
With math, it is the highly skilled and well
trained instructors who provide an excellent education. Standards can only support that fact, not
make up for it. And as stated by one
reviewer, Grant Wiggins in Education Week, “the incoherent nature of the
standards” do not help.
With good intentions the Common Core State
Standards were developed, but the standards do not assist or support Bios
Christian Academy in our goal of serving our families. So to continue our mission of educating
students, teaching them God’s ways, and preparing them for the future, we will
not be adopting the Common Core State Standards.